October, 2009


6
Oct 09

Revolutionizing the revolution

Who knows what the Apple iTablet will look like. But change things it will.

Who knows what the iTablet will look like. But change things it will.

Apple has gotten pretty good at the revolution business. When they enter a category, it is assumed that there will be a world-changing result. It’s fun, it’s exciting, it gets tons of free PR (which preloads the cannon for the next product). Coming soon: iTablet.

Apple does what they do so well, they get credited with inventing a new category — even though, technically speaking, they’re taking over an existing one. They’re revolutionizing someone else’s revolution. You might even argue that, other than the original Apple I computer, Apple has yet to create a single revolution from scratch. They simply identify an existing category and create something better. Vastly, exceedingly, wonderfully better.

The Mac debuted in a world of PCs. MP3 players were the hot device before the first iPod was unveiled. Smartphones were a huge market before iPhone appeared. Now iTablet will revolutionize a category populated by Kindle and its imitators, and all those netbooks. Following the Apple playbook, they will take this idea and turn it into something so fundamentally game-changing that all these other guys will be left scratching their heads and wondering why they didn’t think of that.

Kindle is cool, but shallow. It’s a convenient way to consume print’s black-and-white past. It’s a hint of revolution — but it’s a revolution about to be hijacked.

Just as iPod changed music and iPhone changed communications, iTablet will change the way we consume media. We’ll all say “of course” when we see a simple and elegant way to enjoy newspapers, magazines, books, music, movies and all of the Internet in one painfully cool device. We’ll marvel at the new vision of “the daily paper,” combining print with video and gorgeous graphics that bring stories to life (never mind that it’s all out there on the web already). And we’ll wonder how civilized people could ever have allowed all those trees to be slaughtered, only to be mashed into mega-tons of newsprint that get tossed at the end of the day.

The scope of this revolution requires Apple to recruit partners. Big ones. They’re lining up the major media companies, who will announce new forms of content designed to meet the new iTablet standard, just as they seduced the record companies and movie studios before. Newspapers and magazines, now a dying breed, will re-emerge with new vitality as an integral part of our mobile lives.

It’s not that others couldn’t see this coming. It’s that they didn’t have the will, the ingenuity and the leadership to make it happen. This is a revolution that needed a good hijacking.

Bookmark and Share

2
Oct 09

The curious case of iTunes LP

A cool way to buy online music, curiously named

iTunes moves forward by looking backward, to something we all missed. But about that name...



There are a hundred variables surrounding product naming. No matter what you choose, you can rest assured that many will think it’s the dumbest thing they ever heard. With that in mind, let’s discuss Apple’s decision to call their newest iTunes feature “iTunes LP.”

I find this interesting because there are serious pros and cons to this decision, and it’s fun to imagine yourself being in the room.

iTunes LP is Apple’s way of making the album more appealing. The LP format delivers the album art and liner notes that have been the principle casualty of the online music revolution. If you have enough barnacles, you will recognize the LP name, because that’s what they used to call vinyl albums. It stood for “long-playing.” But does that reference matter — or have any value at all — to the person who’s buying online music today? Or would they have been better off with a more human, more descriptive name?

On the positive side, iTunes LP is indeed long-playing (compared to a single song), and a good reason to buy the album instead of individual tunes. And there is a certain nostalgia that comes with the term. On the negative side, probably only a small percentage of music lovers today are old enough to have that nostalgia. For them, LP is just a couple of letters — about as imaginative as XP. Plus, if you want to get technical, LP refers to the recording format, not the goodies that were a by-product of it.

Naming experts will rightfully tell you to just shut up, because once the first reaction is behind you (a week?), a name is a name. LP is already starting to feel okay. I just find it fascinating because Apple had the opportunity to give this concept a more imaginative name, but didn’t. What would you have said when the table turned to you for an opinion?

Bookmark and Share