dell


26
Jul 10

The dark side of the dark side

While many Mac users already see PCs as “the dark side,” Dell has somehow managed to up the ante on darkness.

According to the S.E.C., the company has been dabbling in a little nastiness called disclosure accounting fraud — and they’ve  just coughed up over $100 million in penalties to make it go away.

In a nutshell, Dell lied. They told the world they were meeting their quarterly goals because of their legendary strengths, when in fact it was because of their legendary weakness: an addiction to Intel’s rebate money. Dell received money for using Intel chips, as well as not using A.M.D. chips. Messy.

The S.E.C. said Dell acted “to project financial results that the company wished it had achieved but could not.” They met Wall Street’s expectations “by breaking the rules.”

Okay, so companies get themselves in legal hot water every day. But Dell managed to do something special. The S.E.C. not only fined Dell the company, they took the rare step of fining Dell the person — along with a handful of his former executives. Seems they created their own little Cosa Vostro.

Documents released by the S.E.C. show just how murky this operation was. Former chief executive Kevin Rollins boasted in 2004 that Dell can meet Wall Street expectations because of its “tightly controlled supply chain, highly efficient infrastructure and direct relationships with customers.” Somehow he confused that with “We’re getting a new shipment of cash from Intel.”

He fessed up in an email to Michael Dell, saying that Intel’s money was the only reason they’d made their numbers for three consecutive quarters. It’s “a bad way to run the railroad,” he said, adding “we are going to have to get off their drug…”

Rollins’ behavior was 100% despicable, but his assessment was 100% correct. They do have to get off this drug. All PC makers have to get off this drug — but they can’t. They became addicted ages ago, when PCs became commodities. Since they can’t make a profit on their products, they hungrily take payments from Intel, Microsoft and the software makers who bloat new PCs with dandy demos. According to The New York Times, some of the emails released by the S.E.C. showed Dell begging Intel for money to make their quarterly results.

All of this, of course, is in stark contrast to Apple — to whom Intel is an ingredient, not a paymaster.

Honestly, I don’t get why Michael Dell still runs his company. CEOs are routinely banished for failing to meet goals, and Michael hasn’t come close to restoring the company in the three years he’s been back. As CEO, he should be dumped even if he had nothing to do with the current mess — and in this case it’s obvious he had everything to do with this mess. Where are the angry villagers with their pitchforks and torches?

(Read The New York Times story here.)

Bookmark and Share

29
Jun 10

Dell’s relentless pursuit of profit

There are two ways to make money in the technology business. You can obsess about making great things, and let profit flow as a result — or simply make profit your #1 priority and act accordingly.

My favorite examples of these two extremes, of course, are Apple and Dell. Apple lives or dies by its ability to innovate, while Dell lives or dies by its ability to generate more clicks every quarter. The companies were born for entirely different reasons — and Dell’s DNA is coming back to haunt them.

Yesterday, the New York Times ran an article about a lawsuit against Dell, and the documents that have come to light as a result. I’m not a fan of Dell, but even I felt icky reading this stuff.

Basically, Dell shipped 11.8 million computers between 2003 and 2005 with faulty electrical components that were leaking chemicals. Rather than own up to it, they stooped to the occasion by concealing the problem and putting customers’ businesses at risk. Astonishingly, Dell even tried to sell them more expensive computers to resolve the problem.

As the article states, “The documents chronicling the failure of the PCs also help explain the decline of one of America’s most celebrated and admired companies.” It will leave your head shaking. A few good quotes:

For the last seven years, the company has been plagued by serious problems, including misreading the desires of its customers, poor customer service, suspect product quality and improper accounting. [I continue to be stunned there hasn't been a shareholder revolt.]

A study by Dell found that OptiPlex computers affected by the bad capacitors were expected to cause problems up to 97 percent of the time over a three-year period … Dell hired a contractor to investigate the situation … the contractor found that 10 times more computers were at risk of failing than Dell had estimated. Making problems worse, Dell replaced faulty motherboards with other faulty motherboards… [It's a whole new kind of Ponzi scheme!]

Dell employees went out of their way to conceal these problems. In one e-mail exchange … a Dell worker states, “We need to avoid all language indicating the boards were bad or had ‘issues’ per our discussion this morning.” [Maybe "the boards were electronically challenged"?]

Dell salespeople were told, “Don’t bring this to customer’s attention proactively” and “Emphasize uncertainty.” [Hell yeah, that'll work. People love uncertainty.]

… hundreds of Dell internal documents produced in the lawsuit show a company whose supply chain had collapsed as it failed to find working motherboards for its customers, including the firm representing Dell in the lawsuit, Alston & Bird. [Hey, what are friends for?]

Every company has a culture, and that culture is what guides employees’ thinking. This isn’t the behavior of an isolated few. It’s a group behavior born of an environment where nothing is more important than the numbers. Unfortunately for Dell, the only known cure for such a failure is leadership.

Bookmark and Share