Posts Tagged: jonathan ive


23
Oct 09

The mouse completes its journey

mouse_history3

Okay, it may not be the most spectacular part of the computing experience — but Apple has always had a special place in its heart for the l’il critter that helped launch Revolution #1.

Here’s a quick stroll down memory lane, starting with the very first Macintosh mouse (which clearly shared some DNA with the common chimney brick).

Savor for a moment one of Apple’s most wretched mistakes: the hockey-puck mouse that shipped with the original iMac. Having no obvious “up” or “down” by feel, it sent cursors flying in all the wrong directions. A classic case of over-design. For consumers it was a major annoyance, for pros (it also shipped with the Power Mac) it was an outright insult.

Fortunately, chief designer Jony Ive recovered from that one. Form and function then lived happily ever after as we got the multi-button mouse with no buttons, the innovative scroll wheel (on the questionably named Mighty Mouse), and now, fresh out of the oven, the Magic Mouse. Clearly, this is the mother of all mice — now standard with the new iMacs and also available separately.

I tried one the other day and, creepy as it may sound, it actually made me smile. The entire mouse is a button, the entire surface is touch sensitive. You scroll or flip through pages simply by sliding a finger or two. It really is one of those “what will they think of next” moments. And it gives you the feeling that Apple puts more thinking into their mouse than most computer makers put into their PCs.

Bookmark and Share

10
Aug 09

Apple reveals its deep, dark secret

Apple's Jonathan Ive and one of his many children

Apple's Jonathan Ive and one of his many children

Apple’s chief designer Jonathan Ive recently made a public appearance in London with the rector of the Royal College of Art. Jony, as most know, is responsible for Apple’s amazing design aesthetic, from iMac to iPod to iPhone. It was with great interest that I read the coverage of Jony’s chat, because he touches on the reasons why Apple is Apple, and by inference, why no other company is Apple. Asked what any executive could do to copy Apple’s success, Ives’ response was: “Don’t.” He went on to explain that every company needs its own raison d’etre, and that this should drive the actions of every employee from the C-suite down. That’s when he also delivered what I think is his most brilliant insight: “Apple’s goal isn’t to make money. Our goal is to design and develop and bring to market good products. We trust that as a consequence of that, we’ll make some money. But we’re really clear what our goals are.”

Damn, I love that. I have a feeling that many out there don’t believe for a second that Apple’s goal isn’t to make money. Having worked intimately with those guys for many years, I can tell you that they absolutely do want to make money, but as Jony says, this is not their goal. Make no mistake: this is a giant, flashing-neon, ultra-critical difference between Apple and most other technology companies. Apple fundamentally believes that you don’t aim for money, you aim for excellence — and money is the result. I’m sure this is just way too idealistic for some, because the real world can’t possibly work this way. Thankfully, Apple is proof that it does. Or at least that it can.

Now let’s get back to Jony’s comment that other companies shouldn’t copy Apple. I’ll agree that every company needs its own vision, but a lot of what Apple does is a blueprint for success for any company. And there’s nothing wrong with copying that. In fact, Apple has practically published a how-to manual for over-achievement: never stop innovating, worship good design, never compromise on quality, make long-term investments in the brand and keep things simple — not just the products, but the marketing as well. Many companies set out with the same values, but are easily sidetracked by money issues, timing issues, marketing issues and idiot issues. At Apple, they will sacrifice investments already made, blow up schedules, kill their #1 products, do whatever it takes to make a better product. They understand that in the end, they will only succeed if they “do the right thing.”

In operating this way, Apple makes it clear what’s wrong with most technology companies. They want Apple’s success, but are unwilling to commit their every resource to it. They play lip service to caring about design by building a beautiful shell around a product that just sucks inside. They demand of their ad agencies a campaign that creates “a buzz like iPhone,” without understanding that Apple’s “overnight success” came only after years of being true to their core belief. As much as I love Apple, I really hope that other companies will wake up to this. I’ll buy cool stuff from anyone. What I don’t get is why, when Apple’s means of success is so visible, other technology companies don’t seem to pick it up.

Bookmark and Share